Real friends can talk about anything. We may as well stress that from the outset. If you're really close to your gay friends, then you don't need to use any of the following guidelines in your heart-to-hearts. But there will still be situations where you will be talking to them in less intimate settings--at a dinner party involving straight people, say, or at a wedding reception--in which it becomes polite and considerate behavior to avoid bringing up certain topics that they may not feel like tackling at the moment, especially in front of a hostile audience.
The dinner or cocktail party, really, is the biggest morass of potential social quagmires. Your other guests will probably be straight, and they may not be as clueful as you are. And in these situations, in which relative strangers must make conversation with each other about something, what your high school administrators would call Current Events often come into play. The hitch lies in the fact that what for your other guests may be merely an interesting issue they came across while browsing Newsweek is, for your gay friends, a concrete problem they have to deal with every day of their lives. This becomes even more important if your gay friends are not very out in their regular lives, because that means they will be less comfortable saying, "Ah, yes, that is a fascinating topic for you perhaps, but like most gay people, I'm WAY SICK of talking about the ban on gays in the military. Anyone seen Independence Day?" Instead, they will sit there miserably nodding their heads as your ROTC ex-college roommate explains to them about the all-importance of unit cohesion, hardly even able to muster up the gumption to mutter "cohere this" under their breath. You don't want this to happen.
Here are some topics that you might consider steering your guests away from:
If your friends are not in the closet, and therefore are willing to engage these persons in debate, the chances are excellent that they do not feel like doing this at something that is supposed to be a recreational function. For them, this is not simply engaging in a bracing intellectual debate. It is defending themselves and what they believe against the forces of ignorance, darkness and denial. This is not something even Batman wants to do on his day off. By bringing these issues up, you or your guests are forcing them to continue banging their heads against the brick wall of heterosexual contrariness. Your friends are at your party because they want to relax and stop doing things that make them cranky and tired. Accomodate their wishes.
Along the same lines, it is also important to act as the chaperon of some of your less enlightened guests, and to head them off at the pass if you see them gearing up to do something really stupid. For instance, if your friends are out, and are out at your party, persons who have not met them before may begin to violate the principles we have laid down in our earlier chapters governing the casual coming-out. Keep an ear out for the conversation and head that way if you hear any of the following:
You see, even though you are too savvy to do these things, your guests may decide to try to turn your friends' orientations into cocktail party conversation, not perhaps realizing that to have the intimate details of one's sexual and emotional life used as fodder for hors-d'oeuvre caliber small-talk is intensely irritating. Unless your gay friends have gone through this enough that they feel justified in saying, "Well, I came by this knowledge same way I imagine you did--when I got my first hard-on. I was lookin' at GI Joe--who were you lookin' at?", this torture will probably continue unabated unless you intervene by asking the guest's opinion on the canapes.
And above, all, never forget the First Principle of Polite Conversation:
YOUR FRIEND IS NOT A SPOKESPERSON.
S/he cannot speak on behalf of the gay and lesbian community and probably doesn't want to. Do not say, in the midst of an argument over The Birdcage, "Well, Alan, do gay people like this movie, or do they find it offensive?" Alan doesn't know. Nobody does. There isn't a listserv out there that distributes the Gay Consensus on a daily basis to all card-carrying homosexuals. Within the gay community opinion is often sharply divded. Some are unwilling to forgive Robin Williams for those oh so hilarious impressions of fruity queens he used to be famous for. Others find the movie and its politics just ducky, but object to having to look at all those florid Hawaiian shirts. Still others haven't a bad word to say about it, and yet others will tell you, "Birdcage, shmirdcage, if Mike Nichols wants to make up for the way he used that poor gay couple in Four Weddings and a Funeral, well, it's gonna take more than Nathan Lane in a feather boa to get this queer back on the bandwagon." And then others will respond, "I didn't have a problem with the gay couple in Four Weddings and a Funeral. I just can't forgive him for making me watch 3 hours of Hugh Grant stammering and making cow-eyes at Andie "Talentless And Not Even Attractive" MacDowell." "Are you kidding me? Hugh Grant is it!" another will respond. "Hugh Grant?" another will cry. "That upperclass-twit no-jawed prostitute-soliciting model-dating bad-name-to-Englishmen-everywhere-giving pile of affectation and nervous laughter? Are you mad?" You get the idea.
Now, if opinion within the community is this diverse about a stupid remake of a French film that came out 20 years ago, you can imagine what a range of opinions there might be about gay marriage, monogamy, what to call one's partner, how best to handle the AIDS crisis, whether "Men On" is a hilarious celebration of queeniness or a deeply homophobic travesty that oughta make any queer with any sense hurl on sight, or what Kenneth Branagh was thinking when he cast Keanu Reeves in Much Ado About Nothing. It is insulting to expect any group of people to think or act as a bloc. Therefore, "And over to Bruce for the queer perspective" is generally not a good conversational move to make. If Bruce feels like speaking for his people--as he may--he will do so.
In a social situation over which you are presiding, it is also important to remember
You know a few. Don't try to tell me you don't. And you even get along with some of them, because many homophobes have other fine qualities which make them hard workers, good friends, and charming dinner guests. So there may be a couple lurking around in your party. If they rear their ugly heads, it is your responsibility as the host to gently push their snouts back into the mud and filth from which they have truculently emerged.
The rebuff should match in tone, severity and intensity the nature of the offense. If your guest has committed an accidental heinosity out of thoughtlessness or ignorance--for instance, saying, "Oh, why didn't you bring your wife along?" to Alan after he mentions that he's married, simply pointing out the error politely is the most appropriate response. After that, the response elevates with the level of intentional offensiveness. A sample graduated scale is appended below:
| Remark | Response |
|---|---|
| "Y'know, I don't see why they think they should be able to get married just like normal people." | "Well, Joe Bob, there are some folks who would say the same about rednecks like yourself." |
| "So these two lesbians walk into a bar..." | "So these 50 bigots walk into the Republican convention..." |
| "Why should we fund AIDS research when it's clearly God's judgment on revolting perverts?" | "I'm sorry, did you not see the NO ASSHOLES sign as you came in? I displayed it clearly above the door..." |
| "Sorry, I can't sit next to him, faggots make me sick." | "Well, I'm afraid the only way I can accomodate your disability is by hog-tying you and tossing you out into the barn, where you will eventually be able to enjoy the dinner when it arrives in the form of pig slop." |
Now, these responses may appear rude to you, but remember that your guest was rude first. Your job as host is to provide a pleasant and relaxing atmosphere for your guests, and if one of your guests is making it impossible for you to do that, well, it's polite to take him out behind the woodshed and give him a good hiding. Metaphorically speaking. Most 'phobes who trumpet this sort of swill do so because they assume no one will mind. If you make it clear that you do mind and you are offended, ten to one says your guest will back down and apologize. It's probably too much to hope for to think that this may also cause your 'phobe to reevaluate his opinion of gay people, but at least you can probably get him to shut up for the duration of the party. If not, it's hog-tyin' and eatin' slop in the barn for him. This is your party, and you'll tie if you want to.
And now, Chapter Three: How Not To Be Like Congress
Copyright ©1996 The Plaid Adder. Do not reproduce this material without the express permission of the author.